tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6508797467947601724.post3854837146497331496..comments2023-09-16T11:35:50.154-04:00Comments on smuglispweeny: Why Lisp Packages are so Easy (Hard)Kenny Tiltonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17430816457662806163noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6508797467947601724.post-29598942676302113002009-01-04T08:13:00.000-05:002009-01-04T08:13:00.000-05:00As much as I love Lisp, another practical problem ...As much as I love Lisp, another practical problem with packages is that there are just so many more symbols to package than in languages that have dot syntax. For example, in Ruby, in theory, a package could export just one symbol, and have all the methods come along for free. I'm not sure I've ever seen this commented on before.Will Fitzgeraldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08337633377540983679noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6508797467947601724.post-608277434221830872008-12-11T12:01:00.000-05:002008-12-11T12:01:00.000-05:00Ok they require some different thinking but this i...Ok they require some different thinking but this is lisp, everything else requires a little different thinking.Slobodan Blazeskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03330021974453479123noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6508797467947601724.post-51262218115467160652008-12-08T03:23:00.000-05:002008-12-08T03:23:00.000-05:00Absolutely right. Noobs screw this one up. Burned ...Absolutely right. Noobs screw this one up. Burned once not twice.<BR/><BR/>I interned a symbol in one package and was testing it from another package and I couldn't find it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com